May 24, 2007

Memorial Day from the Heart of L.A.

Picasso: Guernica

Memorial Day, of course, is not a liturgical feast. In my experience, the churches either ignore it or celebrate it in the most hideously nationalistic way. It had slipped off the radar at my current church long ago; if anyone thought about it at all, they would probably have said that they didn't want to give any impression of glorifying war. Being the nut for observances that I am, I proposed that we take another look at it. After all, most of the war dead are not actually war mongers--most have been motivated by a sincere desire to serve their country or more often by sheer compulsion. And almost every family has lost a member in warfare. My reasoning was that honoring the war dead did not imply endorsement of warfare; war is sadly enough a fact of life, and continues to claim victims, all of whom are somebody's daughter or son, sister or brother, wife or husband, etc., and in a time of war it seemed to me to be especially important to keep a human face on the mortality statistics.

I learned a few interesting things about the history of Memorial Day. For instance:
According to Professor David Blight of the Yale University History Department, the first memorial day was observed in 1865 by liberated slaves at the historic race track in Charleston. The site was a former Confederate prison camp as well as a mass grave for Union soldiers who had died while captive. A parade with thousands of freed blacks and Union soldiers was followed by patriotic singing and a picnic.

The first official Memorial Day observance in 1868 had a distinct element of reconciliation: held at Arlington National Cemetery, graves of Union and Confederate soldiers were decorated with flowers. The date was chosen specifically because it was not the anniversary of a battle.

In our typical way, we indigenized the holiday. Given that our congregation is about 2/3 immigrants, we almost had to. In the spirit of reconciliation implicit in the original official celebration, we extended the recognition to all war dead of any nation, including civilians. It has proved to be a very tender occasion for us. We learned for the first time, for example, that one of our elderly widows had lost her husband during WWII in the Canadian Air Force. A number of the dead soldiers we prayed for were Salvadoran para-military leaders--friends and relatives of our members--who had actually fought against the U.S. Our ritual moment last year was led by Col. Hayward Fong, a Chinese-American who served in WWII and who is one of our most respected and loved members, and Alba Luis, a young Mexican mother who was brought to us by a friend basically to hold the funeral for her son who had been killed in Iraq and has become an invaluable leader among the Spanish speakers. The two of them together at the podium almost eliminated the need for further words.

Not everyone will agree with what we have done. But I'm rather proud of it.


They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.
--Laurence Binyon, from For the Fallen
Footnote to the Picasso painting, from Wikipedia:
A tapestry copy of Picasso's Guernica is displayed on the wall of the United Nations building in New York City, at the entrance to the Security Council room. It was placed there as a reminder of the horrors of war. Commissioned and donated by Nelson Rockefeller, it is not quite as monochromatic as the original, using several shades of brown. On February 5, 2003, in an official act of vandalism, a large blue curtain was placed to cover this work, so that it would not be visible in the background when Colin Powell and John Negroponte gave press conferences at the United Nations. On the following day, it was claimed that the curtain was placed there at the request of television news crews, who had complained that the wild lines and screaming figures made for a bad backdrop, and that a horse's hindquarters appeared just above the faces of any speakers. Diplomats, however, told journalists that the Bush Administration pressured UN officials to cover the tapestry, rather than have it in the background while Powell or other U.S. diplomats argued for war on Iraq.

11 comments:

David Charles Walker said...

Ed, Ed Ed!
I came over to check out your site after being thoroughly exhausted and drained from all the discussion of the "Anglican Wars" this week on all my other favorite blogs. And what do I find here? Respite? Noooo... a picture of... I think it's the Lambeth Conference. Is there no escape?

.....

I remember well when this great painting hung imposingly for many years at MOMA in NYC. It is so incredibly powerful. I hated to see it go "back" to Spain, but that's where it belongs. I'm glad the U.N. has the tapestry reproduction though, because that's where this image *really* belongs... and the actions of the Bush administration to block it out says so much.
Someone said once:
Empires Rise and Empires Fall.
But Art is eternal.

Thanks for posting that. Its an apt memorial for this Memorial Day.

Jane R said...

I am so sick of reading about the Anglican Wars. Perspective, people, perspective! I'm with you, David Charles. Anyway, Ed, THANK YOU for this fine post. On a related matter, I just heard a very moving interview of a Marine reservist officer who is volunteering to go back to Iraq and whose sense of duty is staggering and humbling; he makes the distinction between duty and support of the war, and while I (as you may have figured out by now) have been against this war from the start and am not a fan of the military, I do hear this man loud and clear. (I am also the daughter of a decorated WWII Marine veteran who though a thorough peacemonger now, is still proud to have served as he did.) One of the points he made was that it was very important for people who oppose the war to be in positions of responsibility (which it sounds like he is, he's about to be some kind of aide to General Petraeus) particularly at this time in the war. Well worth a listen. I expect you could get the audio by logging onto the "Here And Now" show at NPR (not sure if it's an APR or NPR production but it's probably not hard to track). And the show aired today, Friday May 25, 2007.

Jane R said...

P.S. I remember the whole veiling of the painting issue when it happened. Oy!

Speaks to the power of art, doesn't it.

Grandmère Mimi said...

How does it make one a war monger to honor the dead who died doing their duty? In this nasty war that we are involved in today, I don't blame those who serve in the military. They are being abused by our "Commander in Chief". I believe it's important to make the distinction.

Every day, I visit Iraq Coalition Casualty Count to pray for the dead and the wounded and their families and friends. It's so sad to see the numbers climb.

Ed said...

What great comments! I wonder if reading about the Lambeth Conference subliminally influenced my choice of art. Here's but one paradox of the situation for me: much as I deplore the current war, I'm almost equally horrified by frequent stories of how poorly equipped our soldiers are to defend themselves. It's the worst of both worlds. Mimi, I'm totally with you--I'll be sure we use the figures from the Iraq Casualty Count on Sunday.

Ed said...

P.S. for Professor Jane: I too use Wikipedia with caution. The quote in post is actually a good example of why as it's clearly biased. However, the bias matches my own, so it's okay!!!

Grandmère Mimi said...

Ed, I thank you for your Memorial Day post also because it was a reminder to me that I should put something up to honor the fallen.

Jane R said...

Mimi, I agree with you - I hope I wasn't unclear.

And Ed, thank you again for a moving post.

Serena said...

Oh Ed .. how I miss that place! (being part of Immanuel would be the only thing that could get me back to LA) thanks for mentioning Hayward & Alba and that service .. give my love to everyone!

johnieb said...

Thank you for the post, Ed, and to the friends and not yet friends who've posted.

As with most things, my reaction to Memorial Day differs in that I am a PTSD disabled Vietnam combat veteran. I cherish the honor that you do us here, but more often than not enraged and disgusted by the cheap grace of much about the public celebration. During an unnecessary war forced by a criminal administration which rubs salt in the meaninglessness of the worst year of my life, it is especially difficult to be at peace.

I'll tell you here and at your place, Mimi, so you get it, but it does me more good than you or I can imagine to hear you tell about how you pray for our troops.

We welcomed a guy from the parish back from a short tour in Kuwait: "In the rear with the gear" a couple of weeks ago. I was especially pleased to welcome him back and to do him honor during the service. As we did so, I thought of my own return, and grief overcame me, and I cried. Nobody noticed, but I told one friend over coffee. There's nothing that can be done now to heal that. Sorry 'bout that.

I hope you don't mind if I copy and paste, Cher grandmere Mimi; I don't know how many times I want to go back over this now.

Peace/ Hoa Binh

Ed said...

JohnieB: I am humbled and deeply moved by your story. Thank you so much for your words. Salaam, Shalom, Pax to you.

P.S. Grandmère rocks the prayers. God love her.